Ports Australia Biennial Conference 2026

Ports Australia Biennial Conference 2026 22–24 Sept · Hyatt Regency Sydney Control Synergy — Exhibitor

Your asset information, all in one place.

Your terminal runs machines from a dozen different manufacturers, each one keeping its operating data to itself. JLT Insights is the layer that gets it all speaking one language, so it lands in one place — your asset information, ready to use.

The situation

Your port already has the data. It just doesn't share a language.

Every reach stacker, forklift, prime mover and crane on the hardstand is producing operating data right now. The problem was never collection — it's that each machine reports in its own format, to its own vendor's system, on its own terms. Nothing lines up, so nothing can be compared.

  • Machine telemetryOEM-specific
  • Impact and safety eventsoften not logged
  • Battery and energy useper-vendor portal
  • Location and movementseparate system
  • Device and app healthIT, not operations
  • Wireless coverageonly visible after a failure
Where JLT Insights sits

Not another dashboard. The layer in between.

One terminal. Many equipment manufacturers. JLT vehicle-mount computers provide a common device layer across your port assets. JLT Insights collects what's happening in your mobile assets and delivers it in a consistent, usable format.

Coming in — mixed, uneven, vendor-shaped
reach stackerOEM feed
forklift fleethour meter only
impact sensorlocal alarm
prime moverno output
access pointsnetwork tooling
GNSS / positionthird-party app
 
The layer
JLT Insights
  • collects
  • adds context
  • normalises
  • surfaces patterns
Going out — one shape, every asset
utilisationcomparable
uptimecomparable
impactscomparable
energycomparable
coveragecomparable
positioncomparable

From there it goes where it's useful — your TOS, maintenance planning, safety review, analytics. Which data points are available, and how they reach your systems, depends on the fleet, the devices fitted and the scope you agree.

Why start here

One data point, no matter who built the machine.

Integrations at the top of the stack inherit whatever machine vendors choose to expose. Starting at the device layer avoids that entirely.

It's already installed

No new hardware programme, no retrofit across the fleet. The computers doing this are the ones your operators are already using every shift.

It doesn't care who built the machine

A JLT unit in a reach stacker and one in a forklift report the same way. Mixed fleet, mixed vintage, mixed supplier — same output.

It sees the network too

Coverage gaps, access point performance and connectivity drop-outs sit alongside the machine data, not in a separate IT report.

What you could ask it

Pick one operational question. Not all of them.

The pilots that work aren't the ones that try to connect everything. They start with a question someone in the terminal actually needs answered.

Uptime

Which units are about to fail?

Device health and diagnostics, read early enough to schedule around rather than react to.

Safety

Where do impacts keep happening?

Impact events set against time and location, so recurring risk shows up as a pattern.

Utilisation

What's actually working, and what's idle?

Usage and movement across the fleet, including the assets nobody thought to question.

Coverage

Why does it drop out at that corner?

Connectivity data from the machines themselves, mapped against where they were standing.

Integration

Can our TOS use any of this?

A scoped assessment of which device-layer data could reach your operating systems, and how.

Energy

Where is the charge going?

Battery and energy behaviour per asset, comparable across a fleet that charges differently.

Straight answer

One format — agreed by the industry, not invented by us.

The value of a common data language only holds if it's a language other systems already speak, without being locked to a particular vendor.

Where are we up to? Today, JLT Insights already delivers real-time positioning, Wi-Fi network visibility, impact detection and driver behaviour — and there's an API framework in place, ready to expose that data to the systems your port needs it in. Aligning that output to PAS 4000 is development work in progress rather than a box already ticked. We'd rather show you what runs today and be straight about what's next.
What PAS 4000 is
A published BSI specification defining a shared vocabulary for cargo-handling data.
Who is behind it
Sponsored by TIC 4.0, the terminal industry's standards body, with terminal operators and technology vendors on the steering group.
What it changes
Comparability between assets, interoperability between systems, and less dependence on any one supplier's format.
What it doesn't do
It sets the grammar, not the full vocabulary. Metrics still have to be mapped to an agreed dictionary for your terminal.
How a pilot actually runs

Five steps, one question, a few weeks.

A pilot isn't a proof-of-concept for the whole platform. It's a scoped answer to the one question you picked above — small enough to run properly, real enough to trust.

01

Define

Choose one question worth answering.

02

Identify

Map the machines, devices and data points involved.

03

Configure

Set up the views, queries and alerts to test it.

04

Evaluate

Check the data holds up and the answer is usable.

05

Decide

Document what worked, what didn't, and what's next.

Sydney · 22–24 September 2026

Come and tell us what your machines aren't telling you.

We're exhibiting at the Ports Australia Biennial Conference. Bring the asset, the system or the blind spot you've been trying to get visibility on — that's the conversation we both want to have.

02 4966 5211 [email protected] Unit 2/5 Cobbans Close, Beresfield NSW 2322